The evidence-backed decision system for founders
Put your idea before the Warden.
The evidence-led judge, built to challenge your assumptions, find what could kill the idea, and tell you what to test next.
Over 140 ideas judged
Meet the Warden
The Warden isn't here to validate your enthusiasm.
Every idea is judged against the same evidence-led framework. Weak assumptions are surfaced, the riskiest one is put to the test, and the verdict can change when real evidence arrives.
The Warden is a judge whose position can be changed by evidence, not a character producing opinions.
01
Verdict
Find what holds and what doesn't.
02
Experiment
Test the riskiest assumption.
03
Evidence
See what people actually do.
04
Decision
Proceed, pivot, or stop.
On the record
Evidence can change the Warden's mind.
“Construction worker-worn authentic distressed denim subscription service.”
Sample caseThe Warden's opening verdict
65PROBATION
After the evidence
81PAROLED+16
Wardict ordered a demand test.
340 visitors31 sign-ups9.1% conversionPassing
4 charges moved on tracked evidence, not on a better argument.
Not another opinion.
Every verdict uses the same published rubric, and sourced evidence is kept separate from assumptions.
Read the methodologyFree verdict, always. Deeper case work on the Full Report or Pro.
Questions
What will Wardict give me?
A verdict: a 0 to 100 Wardict Score against five published charges, the assumption most likely to kill the idea, and the experiment that would resolve it. Cited evidence is logged separately from the Warden's inferences, so you can see what is proven and what is still argued.
Is Wardict free?
Yes. Three verdicts a day are free, including the score breakdown, SWOT, market and competitor read, Buyer Power Map and evidence log. The Full Report and Pro add the deeper case work: the assets to run the experiment, tracked evidence, and the final decision.
Why not just use ChatGPT?
General chat is flexible but inconsistent. Wardict scores every case against the same published, versioned rubric, keeps cited evidence apart from assumption, and turns the riskiest assumption into a real test whose result can move the score. The point is not an opinion. The point is a case file you can revisit, share, and argue with.