Wardict

Wardict for university venture programmes

Better venture decisions for founders. A smarter programme with every cohort.

Wardict gives university venture programmes a consistent way to help founders challenge assumptions, run experiments, gather evidence and make better venture decisions.

Turn your programme's accumulated judgment into a living founder-advice system.

Discuss a pilot

Built for university acceleratorsincubatorsenterprise programmes

What Wardict gives a programme

Structure every venture

Verdict → Experiment → Evidence → Decision

One evidence-led framework across the cohort.

Strengthen human support

Mentors see what changed, what was tested, what the evidence says and what needs discussion.

Build institutional memory

Useful programme judgment can be captured, approved and reused when another founder faces a similar problem.

One framework. Different ventures.

  1. Verdict

    What holds and what doesn't?

  2. Experiment

    What needs testing?

  3. Evidence

    What actually happened?

  4. Decision

    What should happen next?

Every venture follows the same evidence discipline without being forced into the same business model.

Your programme should get smarter every cohort.

Every mentoring conversation contains judgment.

  • A mentor challenges a target customer.
  • A programme lead spots a pricing problem.
  • An adviser recognises a pattern they have seen before.

Wardict helps turn useful, approved insight into programme knowledge that can support future founders.

Your mentors’ experience becomes part of your programme’s memory.

How one conversation reaches the next founder.

  1. Mentor conversation

  2. The Warden reads the notes

    • What was advised?
    • What changed?
    • What should this founder do next?
    • Is there something the programme should remember?

  3. The programme approves

  4. Living programme knowledge

  5. A future founder

  6. Contextual Warden guidance

  7. Experiment and evidence

The programme remembers. The Warden applies. Evidence decides.

One example, end to end

Mentor insight

"You may be interviewing users, not buyers."

Programme guidance

Validate the economic buyer before interpreting willingness-to-pay evidence.

A future founder case

User enthusiasm is strong. The budget owner remains unknown.

The Warden

Speak to three economic buyers before running the pricing test.

Evidence

The case becomes stronger or weaker on what happens next.

Programme guidance says what is worth testing. A mentor’s advice never changes a Wardict result on its own. The student decides what enters their case, and the existing evidence rules decide what it is worth.

Two minutes to understand the case.

Give every mentor consistent context before the conversation begins.

Mentor brief

Maya , WorkshopLoop

Current phase

Evidence

The Warden's main concern

University workshop managers may not control access decisions.

Since last session

5 interviews completed

Demand test launched

New decision-maker uncertainty surfaced

Current evidence

Demand interest: encouraging

Buyer authority: unresolved

Relevant programme guidance

Validate the economic buyer before interpreting pricing evidence.

Questions worth discussing

  1. Who can actually approve access?
  2. What is the institution's motivation?
  3. What would make procurement say no?

An example brief. Maya and WorkshopLoop are illustrative.

The Warden doesn’t replace the mentor. It makes the conversation better.

Wardict handles

  • assumptions
  • tests
  • evidence
  • decision structure
  • programme memory

Your team brings

  • context
  • experience
  • connections
  • judgment
  • coaching

Founders do

  • interviews
  • experiments
  • customer work
  • evidence gathering
  • decisions about their venture

Founders arrive with something more useful than:

“People I spoke to seemed interested.”

Know where human support can make the biggest difference.

24 active ventures

6
ready for mentor review
7
running experiments
5
gathering evidence
4
need attention
2
decisions recorded

6 candidate insights awaiting review

Needs attention

  • Maya, WorkshopLoop

    New evidence that cuts against the case

  • James, LocalLedger

    Experiment designed and not launched

  • Sofia, Refill

    Evidence reviewed, decision not yet recorded

Illustrative. These are not real ventures.

Programme teams see states and counts. They do not see a student’s verdict, score or evidence, and a student’s other Wardict cases stay private. Guidance is generalised before it is kept, so one founder’s conversation never becomes another founder’s reading. See the privacy notice.

Build a programme that remembers.

At the end of each cohort, Wardict preserves more than which ventures took part.

  • what founders repeatedly struggled with
  • what mentors repeatedly challenged
  • what guidance the programme stands behind
  • what founders tested next
  • what the evidence subsequently showed

The next cohort starts with the accumulated experience of the cohorts before it.

Bring Wardict to your next cohort.

  • Give founders a structured path from idea to evidence.
  • Give mentors better context.
  • Give your programme a memory that compounds.

Turn your programme's accumulated judgment into a living founder-advice system.